Hi, | sign out

Posts Tagged ‘information overload’

October 26th, 2010

Information rage shows need for Topicmarks

This week LexisNexis released a survey showing that one in two employees is affected by “information rage”. Completely overwhelmed by the amount of information they are supposed to process, employees are close to giving up. According to the researchers, employees spend less than half of their time actually doing their job, and more than half on “navigating a forest of information.” Only half of which is relevant to the job being done.

Among the causes of information rage, the researchers indicate that managers often pass on whatever information they get to employees. They hope that employees can filter out the relevance for them. But in reality, employees become virtual research assistants in stead of doing their jobs. The team results begin to suffer and so the chances of promotion start withering away.

Smart managers forward emails and attachments to Topicmarks in stead of employees. Not only does Topicmarks produce a perfect summary in just a few minutes, managers can also drill down immediately in any topic of particular interest. And when all employees can produce twice as many results, it is inevitable that the manager gets a promotion too!

Enough already: information overload

 

September 5th, 2010

GMail Priority Inbox doesn’t solve Email Overload

Mere triage does not stem the flow

GMail promises that its recently launched Priority Inbox will help you tackle information overload. But sorting messages by priority does not make them go away—putting the juiciest pancake on top does not make the stack any lower!

Improve the speed of reading and processing

Really dealing with information overload means processing emails more efficiently. It means skimming emails much faster, and confidently discarding unimportant messages altogether. This is where Topicmarks can help.

Mail-in to Topicmarks and you only ever read a summary

Just forward any unimportant message from your inbox to your Topicmarks mail-in address, and Topicmarks sends you back a quick summary. Confidently skim the summaries and pick the few messages you really have to read. Safely discard all the rest—if you ever need them again, they are safely stored in your Topicmarks brain forever.

February 9th, 2009

The Black Swan and How not to be a Sucker

The internet has made the world infinitely more complex. For most of us, the world is made larger because the internet has made it “flat”. Of the many challenges that we confront with the globalization and democratization of information, the greatest is information overload. Information overload not only can obscure fact from opinion, but it has the power to reduce independent thought.

When confronted with too much information, people start to switch off their brains. Some common ways to do this include running with the herd, placing unquestioning trust in authority, constructing abstract,simplifying models of the world, etc. These techniques are designed to make the world appear to be a safer, more predictable, more understandable place. Too much information appears to be have the same effect on human behavior as too little information.

Besides not making us smarter, the internet can dumb us down some as well. We are exposed to the greatest feedback loop in the history of the world. Feedback loops are not necessarily bad until they start leading to irrational behavior. In “Irrational Exuberance”, Robert Shiller describes how amplification mechanisms contribute to booms and busts. In “The Alchemy of Finance”, George Soros outlines his theory of reflexivity, where feedback interactions change objective reality so much, that it becomes no longer possible to distinguish the objective from the subjective.

When an esteemed economist like Robert Shiller describes some market situations as nothing more than a Ponzi scheme, then there must be times when investing in a market makes some-one the sucker.

“The Black Swan: The Impact of the Highly Improbable” has a simple message. The world is not as ordered as we would like it to be. It is suffused with randomness. It is not possible to compute the probabilities of risk. Most if not all of our attempts for understanding order in chaos have led us astray. The only reasonable approach available to us is skeptical empiricism. Think Aristotle, not Plato.

Skeptical empiricism does not lend itself to amplification systems, information cascades and herd-like behavior. It also suggests that solely reading the Wikipedia page is probably not the ideal way to go about learning things. This must be true, if Jon Stewart from “The Daily Show” is parodying Wikipedia

For many of us, our observations derive from the internet. Hence, if we are to be skeptical empiricists, we need to get past this tyrannical information overload problem. The great thing about Topicmarks is that it allows us to compare many documents with the help of machines. In effect, machines help us to collect our empirical observations. And when we are exposed to many viewpoints, not a few, our capacity for critical thinking is tremendously increased. The Black Swan puts the onus on the individual. Topicmarks gives power to the individual.

We all are, as Taleb says, Black Swans. And thank you for reading my blog.