Text knode: LexUriServ.do.pdf

Fact No	Subject	Verb	Object	Weight
1	orisation of the preparation	set out	in the Annex to this Regulation	2
2	application	was submitted	for the auth	1
3	particulars and documents	required	under Article 7 of Regulation	2
4	That application	was accompanied	by the particulars and documents	1
5	chelate of hydroxy analogue of methionine as a feed	additive	for chickens for fattening, to be classified in the additive category 'nutritional additives	2
6	it	results	that manganese chelate of hydroxy analogue of methionine	1
7	Authority) adopted on 15 September 2009 in combination with the one of 15 April 2008	does not have	adverse effect on animal health, human health or the environment for chickens for fattening	4
8	use of that preparation	may be considered	as a source of available manganese and fulfils the criteria of a nutritional additive for chickens for fattening	1
9	Authority	recommends	appropriate measures for user safety	2
10	It	does not consider	that there is a need for specific requirements of post-market monitoring	1
11	Community Reference Laboratory	set up	by Regulation	2
12	feed	submitted	by the Community Reference Laboratory	2
13	It	verified	report on the method of analysis of the feed additive in feed	1
14	use of that preparation	should be	auth- orised, as specified in the Annex to this Regulation	2
15	Annex	belonging	to the additive category 'nutritional additives' and to the functional group	1
16	preparation	specified	in the Annex	1
17	conditions	laid down	in that Annex	1
18	accordance with the opinion of the Standing Committee on the Food Chain and Animal Health	is authorised	as an additive in animal nutrition subject to the conditions	4
19	breathing protection, safety glasses and gloves	should be worn	during handling	1
20	Article 10 of that Regulation	provides	for the reevaluation of additives authorised pursuant to Council Directive 70/524/EEC	3
21	ingstuffs and the provisional authorisation of a new use of an additive	authorised	in feedingstuffs	1
22	That additive	was	subsequently entered into the Community Register of feed additives as an existing product, in accordance with Article 10 of Regulation	4
23	use of that additive	can improve	performance of the animals	1
24	additive	does not have	adverse effect on animal health, consumer health or the environment	2
25	Authority	recommends	appropriate measures for user safety	2
26	It	does not consider	that there is a need for specific requirements of post market moni- toring	1
27	Community Reference Laboratory	set up	by Regulation	2
28	feed	submitted	by the Community Reference Laboratory	2
29	Authority	verified	report on the method of analysis of the feed additive in feed	3
30	assessment of that additive	shows	are satisfied	1
31	use of that preparation	should be authorised	as specified in the Annex to this Regulation	2
32	preparation	specified	belonging to the additive category 'zootechnical additives' and to the functional group 'other zootechnical additives	1
33	preparation	specified	in the Annex	1
34	accordance with the opinion of the Standing Committee on the Food Chain and Animal Health	is authorised	as an additive	3
35	Ion chromatography method	equipped	with electrical conductivity detection	1
36	Ion chromatography method	must not exceed	permitted maximum level in complete feedingstuff of 12 000 mg/kg of complete feed- ingstuff	1
37	additive	shall be	incor- porated in feed in form of a premixture	1
38	regard to Council Regulation	laying down	Community procedures for contaminants in food, and in particular Article 2 thereof	3
39	maximum levels for certain	contaminants	in foodstuffs	1
40	updated scientific opinion	relating	to ochratoxin	1
41	updated scientific opinion	relating	OTA) in food	1
42	updated scientific opinion	taking	into account new scientific information	1
43	updated scientific opinion	derived	tolerable weekly intake	1
44	EFSA	adopted	on 4 April 2006	1
45	EFSA	has	request from the Commission	2
46	Safety Authority	adopted	on 4 April 2006	2
47	Safety Authority	has	request from the Commission	3
48	appropriateness of setting a maximum level for OTA in foodstuffs such as dried fruit other than dried vine fruit, cocoa and cocoa products, spices, meat products, green coffee, beer and liquorice, as well as a review of the existing maximum levels, in particular for OTA in dried vine fruit and grape juice	has	to be considered in the light of the recent EFSA scientific opinion	3
49	existing maximum levels	have	to be retained	1
50	existing maximum levels	protect	public health	2
51	existing maximum levels	appear	appropriate	1
52	maximum level	is	appro- priate to be set in these cases to avoid that those very highly contaminated commodities could enter the food chain	1
53	they	are not	significant contributor to OTA	1
54	high levels of OTA	have been found	only seldom in those commodities	1
55	it	does not appear	necessary for the protection of public health to set a maximum level of OTA in dried fruit other than dried vine fruit, cocoa and cocoa products, meat products, including edible offal and blood products and liqueur wines as they are not a significant contributor to OTA exposure	3
56	presence of OTA	is	already controlled at another more appropriate stage of the production chain	1
57	It	is	therefore appro- priate to set a maximum level for spices and liquorice	1
58	countries of spices	exporting	to the Union	1
59	no prevention measures and official controls	are	to control the presence of ochratoxin A in spices	2
60	no prevention measures and official controls	are	in place	1
61	it	establish	without delay a maximum level for ochratoxin A in spices	1
62	producing countries	disrupt	trade to an unacceptable extent	1
63	producing countries	put	prevention measures in place	1
64	maximum level	reflecting	level achievable by applying good practices	1
65	maximum level	enters	into application	2
66	higher maximum level, applicable within short notice	is established	for a limited period of time	1
67	It	is	appropriate that an assessment of the achievability in the different producing regions in the world of the levels for ochratoxin A by applying good practices takes place before the stricter level applies	1
68	It	continue	monitoring of OTA in foodstuffs for which no maximum level has been set	2
69	setting of a maximum level for OTA in those foodstuffs	might be considered	as appropriate	1
70	1 kg of extract	is obtained	from 3 to 4 kg liquorice root	1
71	investigations	undertaken	including occurrence data and the progress with regard to the application of prevention measures to avoid contamination by ochratoxin A in spices	3
72	Interested parties	shall communicate	to the Commission the results of investigations	2
73	Member States	should report	to the Commission findings on ochratoxin A in spices on a regular basis	4
74	Commission	will make	this information available to the Member States in view of an assessment, before the stricter level applies, of the achievability in the different producing regions in the world of the stricter level for ochratoxin A in spices by applying good practices	5
75	This Regulation	shall not apply	to products which were placed on the market at a date prior to 1 July 2010 in conformity with the provisions applicable at such date	2
76	ochratoxin A	established	in point 2.2.11 of the Annex which is applicable as from 1 July 2012	1
77	maximum level for ochratoxin A	shall not apply	to products which were placed on the market at a date prior to 1 July 2012 in conformity with the provisions applicable at such date	2
78	products	were placed	on the market	1
79	burden of proving	shall be borne	by the food business operator	1
80	This Regulation	shall enter	into force on the 20th day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union	3
81	accounts	submitted	by the Greek paying agency	1
82	Commission	take	decision on the integrality, accuracy and veracity of the accounts	3
83	Portuguese	paying	agencies	1
84	additional checks	opekepe	Maltese paying agency 'MRAE', the Portuguese paying agencies 'IFADAP' and 'IFAP' and the Finnish paying agency 'MAVI	1
85	amounts	are	to be deducted from, or added to, the advances against expenditure from the second month following that in which the accounts clearance decision is taken	2
86	recovery of those irregularities	has not taken	place within 4 years of the primary administrative or judicial finding, or within 8 years	1
87	recovery	is taken	to the national courts	1
88	recovery procedures	undertaken	response to irregularities	1
89	Member States	submit	to the Commission, together with the annual accounts, a summary report on the recovery procedures	4
90	Detailed rules on the appli- cation of the Member States' reporting obligation of the amounts to be recovered	are laid down	in Regulation	3
91	Annex III to the said Regulation	provides	model tables 1 and 2 that have to be provided in 2008 by the Member States	4
92	tables	completed	by the Member States	2
93	Commission	should decide	on the financial consequences of non-recovery of irregularities older than 4 or 8 years respectively	1
94	This Decision	is	prejudice to future conformity decisions pursuant to Article 32 of Regu- lation	3
95	Member States	may decide	not to pursue recovery	2
96	recovery	proves	owing to the insolvency, recorded and recognised under national law, of the debtor or the persons legally responsible for the irregularity	1
97	recovery	proves	impossible	1
98	decision	be taken	costs already and likely to be incurred total more than the amount to be recovered	1
99	recovery	is taken	to the national courts	1
100	that decision	has been taken	within 4 years of the primary administrative or judicial finding or within 8 years	1
101	100 % of the financial consequences of the non-recovery	should be borne	by the Community budget	1
102	summary report	referred	to in Article 32 of Regulation	2
103	Member State	decided	not to pursue recovery and the grounds for the decision	3
104	amounts	be borne	by the Community budget	1
105	amounts	are not charged	to the Member States concerned	2
106	This Decision	is	without prejudice to future conformity decisions pursuant to Article 32 of the said Regu- lation	3
107	Member States	concerned	on the basis of Decisions 2008/396/EC and 2009/87/EC	3
108	amounts	withheld	from the Member States	2
109	Commission	must take	account of the amounts	2
110	decisions	taken	subsequently by the Commission excluding from Community financing expenditure not effected in accordance with Community rules, The accounts of the Greek paying agency	4
111	Portuguese	paying	agencies 'IFADAP' and 'IFAP	1
112	MAVI' concerning expenditure financed by the European Agricultural Guarantee Fund (EAGF), in respect of the 2007 financial year	financed	by the European Agricultural Guarantee Fund	2
113	this Decision	does not prejudice	OPEKEPE', the Maltese paying agency 'MRAE	2
114	Member State	concerned	pursuant to this Decision, including those	3
115	amounts	are	recoverable from, or payable to	1
116	amounts	are set out	in the Annex	1
117	This Decision	is addressed	to the Republic of Greece, the Republic of Malta, the Portuguese Republic and the Republic of Finland	1
118	amount	taken	into account	1
119	amount	is	total of the annual declaration for the expenditure cleared	1
120	Assigned revenue part	would be	in advantage of Member State	2
121	Assigned revenue part of the Sugar Fund	would be	in the advantage of the Member State	2
122	Functioning of the European Union, inafter the group	set up	by Commission Decision 2006/210/EC	4
123	Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, inafter the group	is	consultative group of high-level national experts on better regulation	3
124	better regulation	will remain	high on the Commission's political agenda	2
125	promotion of cooperation with Member States on better regulation issues	has	important role to play in taking forward that agenda	3
126	other documents	held	by statutory auditors or audit firms to the competent authorities of a third country	5
127	competent authorities of third countries	are	adequate for the purpose of transfer of audit working papers or other documents	5
128	other documents	held	by statutory auditors or audit firms to the competent authorities of a third country	5
129	transfer of audit working papers or other documents	reflects	substantial public interest related to carrying out inde- pendent public oversight	4
130	any such transfer by the competent authorities of Member States	should be made	solely for the purpose of the exercise of the competences of public oversight, external quality assurance and investigations of auditors and audit firms by the competent authorities of the third country concerned	10
131	information	are	subject to obligations of professional secrecy	1
132	persons	employed	formerly employed by competent authorities of the third country that receive	2
133	personal data	carried out	pursuant to this Directive	2
134	Council of 24 October 1995 on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data	applies	to the processing of personal data	2
135	other documents	held	by statutory auditors or audit firms to the competent authorities of the third countries	5
136	transfer of audit working papers or other documents	involves	disclosure of personal data	4
137	it	be carried out	in accordance with the provisions of Directive 95/46/EC	1
138	personal data	comprised	in transferred audit working papers	3
139	other documents	held	by statutory auditors or audit firms without the prior agreement of the competent authorities of the Member States concerned	6
140	Member States	should ensure	through working arrangements in accordance with Chapter IV of Directive 95/46/EC between their competent authorities and the competent authorities of third countries that the latter would not further disclose	5
141	European Data Protection Supervisor	was consulted	in respect of the present Decision	4
142	adequacy of competent authorities of a third country	should be assessed	in the light of the cooperation requirements pursuant to Article 36 of Directive 2006/43/EC or essentially equivalent functional results	4
143	competences	exercised	by the competent authorities of the third country	2
144	professional secrecy and confidentiality rules	implemented	by them	1
145	adequacy	should be assessed	in the light of the competences exercised by the competent authorities of the third country concerned, the safeguards against breaching professional secrecy and confidentiality rules implemented by them and their ability under their laws and regulations to cooperate with the competent authorities of Member States	5
146	Directive 2006/43/EC	have been carried out	with respect to the competent authorities of Canada, Japan and Swit- zerland	3
147	Adequacy decisions	should be taken	on the basis of those assessments with respect to those authorities	3
148	It	implements	sanctioning disclosure by its current or former employees of confidential information to any third person or authority	2
149	transferred audit	working	papers	3
150	purposes	related	to the public oversight, external quality assurance and inves	2
151	other documents	held	by statutory auditors or audit firms solely for purposes	3
152	It	would use	transferred audit	2
153	audit	working	papers	3
154	other documents	held	by Canadian auditors or audit firms to the competent authorities of any Member State	6
155	it	may transfer	audit	2
156	Canadian Public Accountability Board	should be declared	adequate for the purpose of Article 47 of Directive 2006/43/EC	3
157	Public Accountants and Auditing Oversight Board within the Financial Services Agency of Japan	have competence	in the public oversight, external quality assurance and investigations of auditors and audit firms	7
158	This Decision	cover	to investigate auditors and audit firms	4
159	This Decision	cover	competences of the Financial Services Agency	2
160	audit	working	papers	3
161	other documents	held	by Japanese auditors or audit firms to the competent authorities of any Member State	6
162	they	may transfer	audit	2
163	Financial Services Agency of Japan and the Certified Public Accountants and Auditing Oversight Board of Japan	should be declared	adequate for the purpose of Article 47 of Directive 2006/43/EC	4
164	It	implements	sanctioning disclosure by its current or former employees of confidential information to any third person or authority	2
165	transferred audit	working	papers	3
166	purposes	related	to the public oversight, external quality assurance and inves	2
167	other documents	held	by statutory auditors or audit firms solely for purposes	3
168	It	would use	transferred audit	2
169	audit	working	papers	3
170	other documents	held	by Swiss auditors or audit firms to the competent authorities of any Member State	6
171	it	may transfer	audit	2
172	Federal Audit Oversight Authority of Switzerland	should be declared	adequate for the purpose of Article 47 of Directive 2006/43/EC	5
173	transmission to the authorities	declared	adequate under this Decision of audit working papers or other documents held by statutory auditors or audit firms, upon prior agreement of the competent authorities of Member States, and access to or transmission of such papers by the competent authorities of Member States to those authorities	10
174	audit	working	papers	3
175	ones	set out	in this Decision	1
176	statutory auditors and audit firms	should not be allowed	to grant access, nor to transmit audit working papers or other documents held by statutory auditors or audit firms to those authorities under other conditions than the ones set out in this Decision and in Article 47 of Directive 2006/43/EC, for example on the basis of consent of the statutory auditor, the audit firms or the client company	9
177	eration arrangements	referred	to in Article 25 of Directive 2004/109/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 December 2004 on the harmon- isation of transparency requirements in relation to information about issuers whose securities are admitted to trading on a regulated market and amending Directive 2001/34/EC	5
178	This Decision	should be	without prejudice to the coop	1
179	this Decision	is taken	in the context of the transi	1
180	tional period	granted	to certain third country auditors and audit firms by Commission Decision 2008/627/EC of 29 July 2008 concerning a transitional period for audit activities of certain third country auditors and audit entities	6
181	this Decision	should not preempt	any final equivalence decisions that the Commission may adopt pursuant to Article 46 of Directive 2006/43/EC	5
182	eration between the competent authorities of the Member States and those of Canada, Japan and Swit	allow	exercise of their functions of public oversight, external quality assurance and investi	6
183	cooperation	takes	place in accordance with Article 47 of the Directive 2006/43/EC	2
184	working arrangements	concluded	with those authorities to allow the Commission to assess	3
185	Member States	should communicate	to the Commission the working arrangements	3
186	transfers of audit working papers	would be	exceptional	3
187	Switzerland in audit oversight	is	to reach mutual reliance on each other's oversight systems	4
188	mutual reliance	would be based	on the equivalence of Community and those countries' auditor oversight systems	3
189	following competent authorities of third countries	shall be considered	adequate for the purpose of Article 47 of Directive 2006/43/EC	3
190	other documents	held	by statutory auditors or audit firms	3
191	it	shall be carried out	by the competent authority of the Member State concerned	3
192	Article 53 of Directive 2006/43/EC, as of 29 June 2008, any transfer of audit working papers or other documents	shall be	either subject to prior approval by the competent authority of the Member State concerned	8
193	held by statutory auditors or audit firms	shall not serve	any other purposes than the public oversight, external quality assurance or investigations of auditors and audit firms	7
194	Decision 2005/880/EC	allowing	Netherlands the application of 250 kg nitrogen per hectare per year from livestock manure in farms with at least 70 %	3
195	Dutch legislation	implementing	Directive 91/676/EEC	1
196	phosphate and application standards	related	to phosphate aimed to achieve an equilibrium in phosphate fertilisation by 2015	1
197	Netherlands	addressed	issue of nutrient surplus from manure and mineral fertilisers through several policy instruments and in the period 1992 to 2002	1
198	Netherlands	decreased	cattle numbers by 17 %, pigs by 14 % and sheep and goats by 21 %	1
199	Dutch legislation	included	application standards both for nitrogen and phosphate and application standards	2
200	Nitrogen and phosphorus in manure	decreased	respectively by 29 and 34 % in the period 1985 to 2002	2
201	manure	requested	by the Netherlands	1
202	manure	would not prejudice	achievement of the objectives of Directive 91/676/EEC, subject to certain strict conditions being met	2
203	conditions	included	establishment of fertiliser plans on a farm by farm basis, the recording of fertiliser practices through fertiliser accounts, periodic soil analysis, green cover in winter after maize, specific provisions on grass ploughing, no manure application before grass ploughing and adjustment of fertilisation to take into account the contribution of leguminous crops	2
204	sation	based	on crop needs and reduction and prevention of nitrogen losses to water	2
205	provisions	were aimed	at ensuring fertili- sation	1
206	derogation	granted	by Decision 2005/880/EC	2
207	competent authorities	were compelled	to ensure that manure production both in terms of nitrogen	3
208	phosphorus	would not increase	beyond the level of the year 2002 in accordance with the Dutch third national action program	3
209	derogation	would lead	to intensification	1
210	reports	referred	to in Article 8 and Article 10 of Decision 2005/880/EC in time	2
211	request	referred	to a detailed justification and to the approval of fourth Nitrates Action Programme	1
212	request	referred	Dutch House of Representatives	1
213	considerable) progress	made	in line with the conditions of the 2006- 2009 derogation and the challenges ahead	1
214	stricter phosphorus application standards	based	on the soil phosphorus status	2
215	It	closed	periods for land application of fertilisers	1
216	It	builds	further on the third action program	2
217	legal measures	need be	by further reinforced action beyond the period 2010-2013	1
218	legal measures	aim	at a further reduction of nutrient surplus and further improvement of water quality	1
219	concentration (including phosphorus) in surface water with main effects of the third action	program	to be expected in the upcoming years	2
220	period 2006-2009 approximately 24 000 grassland farms corresponding to approximately 830 000 ha of cultivated land	were encompassed	by the derogation	1
221	derogation	leads	to intensification	1
222	competent authorities	should continue	to ensure that manure production both in terms of nitrogen	3
223	phosphorus	does not increase	level of the year 2002	1
224	Directive 91/676/EEC and executing the fourth action program	has been adopted	applies equally to the requested derogation	2
225	Commission	considers	that the amount of manure requested by the Netherlands for the period 2010-2013	2
226	strict conditions	established	by Decision 2005/880/EC	1
227	themselves	would not prejudice	achievement of the objectives of Directive 91/676/EEC	1
228	concerned	may continue	to benefit from a derogation	1
229	it	extend	validity of Decision 2005/880/EC to 31 December 2013 under the same conditions as those	2
230	Article 10 of Decision 2005/880/EC	be adapted	aligned with the deadline for reporting obligations under article 8 of Decision 2005/880/EC	3
231	report	shall be transmitted	to the Commission annually in the second quarter of the year following the year of activity	2
232	This Decision	shall apply	until 31 December 2013 in the context of the fourth Dutch Nitrates Action Programme	3
233	regard to Regulation (EC) No 999/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 May 2001	laying down	rules for the prevention, control and eradication of certain transmissible spongiform encephalopathies, and in particular the second subparagraph of Article 6	3
234	prevention, control and eradication of transmissible spongiform	encephalopathies	TSEs	1
235	Member State	carry out	annual moni- toring programme for TSEs, in accordance with Annex III to that Regulation	5
236	bovine animals	belonging	to specified age groups	1
237	programmes	are	to cover as a minimum certain subpopulations of bovine animals	1
238	improvement of the epidemiological situation of their country	may have	annual monitoring programmes	1
239	Member States	listed	to revise their annual monitoring programmes	2
240	Member States	listed	in the Annex to that Decision	4
241	all animals	belonging	to certain subpopulations of bovine animals above 48 months of age	1
242	programmes	are	to apply at least to all animals	1
243	Commission	revise	annual monitoring programme as regards BSE	3
244	I of Chapter A of Annex III to Regulation	laid down	in Cyprus from 29 June 2009 to 3 July 2009 in order to verify compliance with the epidemiological criteria	3
245	implementation in Cyprus of the rules on protective measures regarding bovine spongiform encephalopathies	laid down	in Regulation	2
246	implementation in Cyprus of the rules on protective measures regarding bovine spongiform encephalopathies	laid down	No 999/2001	1
247	all the requirements laid down in the third subparagraph of Article 6(1b) and all the epidemiological criteria	laid down	in the third subparagraph of Article 6	1
248	all the epidemiological criteria	set out	in point 7 of Part I of Chapter A of Annex III to that Regulation	2
249	all the requirements laid down in the third subparagraph of Article 6(1b) and all the epidemiological criteria	were checked	found to be met by Cyprus	1
250	submitted by Cyprus to revise its annual monitoring programme as regards BSE	has been	favourably evaluated	2
251	BSE	testing	in that Member State	2
252	48 months	is	new age limit for BSE	1
253	Cyprus	revise	annual monitoring program	1
254	Annex to Decision 2009/719/EC	is replaced	by the text in the Annex to this Decision	4
255	objective	is	to foster better exploitation of the industrial potential of policies of innovation, research and technological development in the field of Earth obser- vation and to provide information services	2
256	various partners	involved	in GMES	1
257	vation capacity	meeting	demands of users	1
258	it	is	necessary to coordinate the activities of the various partners involved in GMES and to develop, establish and operate a service and obser- vation capacity	1
259	Commission	may need	to call upon the expertise of specialists in an advisory body	1
260	we care for a safer planet', the Commission	announced	establishment of a Partners Board to assist the Commission in the overall coordination of GMES	3
261	It	is	therefore necessary to set up a group of experts in the field of GMES and Earth observation and to define its tasks and its structure	1
262	group	should help	to ensure the coordination of contributions to GMES by all partners, making best use of existing capacities and identifying gaps to be addressed at Union level	2
263	Commission in moni	toring	coherent implementation of the European Earth Observation Programme	4
264	It	should assist	Commission in moni	1
265	It	enable	exchange of good practices in GMES and Earth observation	1
266	It	should monitor	evolution of policy	1
267	Representatives	should be nominated	by their national authorities responsible for Earth observation in their Member State	4
268	security as	set out	in the Annex to Commission Decision 2001/844/EC, ECSC, Euratom	3
269	Board	should be provided	for, without prejudice to the Commission's rules on security as	2
270	organisations	involved	in Earth observation	1
271	Representatives of organisations	attend	meetings of the group as observers	1
272	Commission	consider	advisability of an extension	1
273	Commission	will	in due time	2
274	GMES Partners Board	referred	to as 'the Board	1
275	GMES Partners Board	is	hereby set up	1
276	questions	related	to GMES, in order to help ensure coordination of contributions by national and European Union's activities to GMES, make best use of existing capacities and identify	2
277	to establish cooperation between Member States bodies and the Commission on questions	gaps	to be addressed at European level	4
278	GMES activities	cost	assessment and preliminary budgetary strategy	1
279	it	consult	Board on a specific question	1
280	members	shall be nominated	by national authorities of the Member States	4
281	representative of Switzerland and a representative of Norway	shall be invited	as permanent observers	1
282	They	are replaced	term of office ends	1
283	They	shall remain	in office	1
284	Commission	shall be assisted	by the European Space Agency	3
285	matters	related	to the in situ component of the GMES program	2
286	Commission	shall be assisted	by the European Environment Agency	3
287	procedures and schedule	established	by it	1
288	Board and its subgroups	meet	on Commission premises in accordance with the procedures and schedule	2
289	Commission	shall provide	secre- tarial services	2
290	Other Commission officials with an interest in the proceedings	may attend	meetings of the Board and its sub- groups	2
291	rules of procedure	adopted	by the Commission	2
292	annual budget	allocated	to the Board by the responsible Commission departments	2
293	This Decision	shall enter	into force on the third day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union	4
294	Subscriptions to the Official Journal of the European Union	is published	in the official languages of the European Union	4
295	Subscriptions to the Official Journal of the European Union	are	available for 22 language versions	3
296	Official Journal	comprises	two series, L	1
297	separate subscription	must be taken out	for each language version	1
298	accordance with Council Regulation	published	in Official Journal L 156 of 18 June 2005	3
299	institutions of the European Union	are	temporarily not bound by the obligation to draft all acts in Irish and publish them in that language	2
300	Irish editions of the Official Journal	are	therefore sold separately	1
301	Subscriptions to the Supplement to the Official Journal (S Series - tendering procedures for public contracts)	cover	all 23 official language versions on a single multilingual CD-ROM	2
302	subscribers to the Official Journal of the European Union	can receive	various Annexes to the Official Journal	3
303	notices	inserted	in the Official Journal of the European Union	2
304	Subscribers	are informed	of the publication of Annexes by notices	1
305	CD-Rom formats	will be replaced	by DVD formats during 2010	1
306	periodicals, such as the subscription to the Official Journal of the European Union	are	available from our commercial distributors	2
307	http://eur-lex.europa.eu	offers	direct access to European Union legislation free of charge	2
308	http://publications.europa.eu/others/agents/index_en.htm EUR-Lex	offers	direct access to European Union legislation free of charge	2
309	Official Journal of the European Union	can be consulted	on this website, as can the Treaties	2

1

orisation of the preparation

set out

in the Annex to this Regulation

2

application

was submitted

for the auth

1

3

particulars and documents

required

under Article 7 of Regulation

2

4

That application

was accompanied

by the particulars and documents

1

5

chelate of hydroxy analogue of methionine as a feed

additive

for chickens for fattening, to be classified in the additive category 'nutritional additives

2

6

it

results

that manganese chelate of hydroxy analogue of methionine

1

7

Authority) adopted on 15 September 2009 in combination with the one of 15 April 2008

does not have

adverse effect on animal health, human health or the environment for chickens for fattening

4

8

use of that preparation

may be considered

as a source of available manganese and fulfils the criteria of a nutritional additive for chickens for fattening

1

9

Authority

recommends

appropriate measures for user safety

2

10

It

does not consider

that there is a need for specific requirements of post-market monitoring

1

11

Community Reference Laboratory

set up

by Regulation

2

12

feed

submitted

by the Community Reference Laboratory

2

13

It

verified

report on the method of analysis of the feed additive in feed

1

14

use of that preparation

should be

auth- orised, as specified in the Annex to this Regulation

2

15

Annex

belonging

to the additive category 'nutritional additives' and to the functional group

1

16

preparation

specified

in the Annex

1

17

conditions

laid down

in that Annex

1

18

accordance with the opinion of the Standing Committee on the Food Chain and Animal Health

is authorised

as an additive in animal nutrition subject to the conditions

4

19

breathing protection, safety glasses and gloves

should be worn

during handling

1

20

Article 10 of that Regulation

provides

for the reevaluation of additives authorised pursuant to Council Directive 70/524/EEC

3

21

ingstuffs and the provisional authorisation of a new use of an additive

authorised

in feedingstuffs

1

22

That additive

was

subsequently entered into the Community Register of feed additives as an existing product, in accordance with Article 10 of Regulation

4

23

use of that additive

can improve

performance of the animals

1

24

additive

does not have

adverse effect on animal health, consumer health or the environment

2

25

Authority

recommends

appropriate measures for user safety

2

26

It

does not consider

that there is a need for specific requirements of post market moni- toring

1

27

Community Reference Laboratory

set up

by Regulation

2

28

feed

submitted

by the Community Reference Laboratory

2

29

Authority

verified

report on the method of analysis of the feed additive in feed

3

30

assessment of that additive

shows

are satisfied

1

31

use of that preparation

should be authorised

as specified in the Annex to this Regulation

2

32

preparation

specified

belonging to the additive category 'zootechnical additives' and to the functional group 'other zootechnical additives

1

33

preparation

specified

in the Annex

1

34

accordance with the opinion of the Standing Committee on the Food Chain and Animal Health

is authorised

as an additive

3

35

Ion chromatography method

equipped

with electrical conductivity detection

1

36

Ion chromatography method

must not exceed

permitted maximum level in complete feedingstuff of 12 000 mg/kg of complete feed- ingstuff

1

37

additive

shall be

incor- porated in feed in form of a premixture

1

38

regard to Council Regulation

laying down

Community procedures for contaminants in food, and in particular Article 2 thereof

3

39

maximum levels for certain

contaminants

in foodstuffs

1

40

updated scientific opinion

relating

to ochratoxin

1

41

updated scientific opinion

relating

OTA) in food

1

42

updated scientific opinion

taking

into account new scientific information

1

43

updated scientific opinion

derived

tolerable weekly intake

1

44

EFSA

adopted

on 4 April 2006

1

45

EFSA

has

request from the Commission

2

46

Safety Authority

adopted

on 4 April 2006

2

47

Safety Authority

has

request from the Commission

3

48

appropriateness of setting a maximum level for OTA in foodstuffs such as dried fruit other than dried vine fruit, cocoa and cocoa products, spices, meat products, green coffee, beer and liquorice, as well as a review of the existing maximum levels, in particular for OTA in dried vine fruit and grape juice

has

to be considered in the light of the recent EFSA scientific opinion

3

49

existing maximum levels

have

to be retained

1

50

existing maximum levels

protect

public health

2

51

existing maximum levels

appear

appropriate

1

52

maximum level

is

appro- priate to be set in these cases to avoid that those very highly contaminated commodities could enter the food chain

1

53

they

are not

significant contributor to OTA

1

54

high levels of OTA

have been found

only seldom in those commodities

1

55

it

does not appear

necessary for the protection of public health to set a maximum level of OTA in dried fruit other than dried vine fruit, cocoa and cocoa products, meat products, including edible offal and blood products and liqueur wines as they are not a significant contributor to OTA exposure

3

56

presence of OTA

is

already controlled at another more appropriate stage of the production chain

1

57

It

is

therefore appro- priate to set a maximum level for spices and liquorice

1

58

countries of spices

exporting

to the Union

1

59

no prevention measures and official controls

are

to control the presence of ochratoxin A in spices

2

60

no prevention measures and official controls

are

in place

1

61

it

establish

without delay a maximum level for ochratoxin A in spices

1

62

producing countries

disrupt

trade to an unacceptable extent

1

63

producing countries

put

prevention measures in place

1

64

maximum level

reflecting

level achievable by applying good practices

1

65

maximum level

enters

into application

2

66

higher maximum level, applicable within short notice

is established

for a limited period of time

1

67

It

is

appropriate that an assessment of the achievability in the different producing regions in the world of the levels for ochratoxin A by applying good practices takes place before the stricter level applies

1

68

It

continue

monitoring of OTA in foodstuffs for which no maximum level has been set

2

69

setting of a maximum level for OTA in those foodstuffs

might be considered

as appropriate

1

70

1 kg of extract

is obtained

from 3 to 4 kg liquorice root

1

71

investigations

undertaken

including occurrence data and the progress with regard to the application of prevention measures to avoid contamination by ochratoxin A in spices

3

72

Interested parties

shall communicate

to the Commission the results of investigations

2

73

Member States

should report

to the Commission findings on ochratoxin A in spices on a regular basis

4

74

Commission

will make

this information available to the Member States in view of an assessment, before the stricter level applies, of the achievability in the different producing regions in the world of the stricter level for ochratoxin A in spices by applying good practices

5

75

This Regulation

shall not apply

to products which were placed on the market at a date prior to 1 July 2010 in conformity with the provisions applicable at such date

2

76

ochratoxin A

established

in point 2.2.11 of the Annex which is applicable as from 1 July 2012

1

77

maximum level for ochratoxin A

shall not apply

to products which were placed on the market at a date prior to 1 July 2012 in conformity with the provisions applicable at such date

2

78

products

were placed

on the market

1

79

burden of proving

shall be borne

by the food business operator

1

80

This Regulation

shall enter

into force on the 20th day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union

3

81

accounts

submitted

by the Greek paying agency

1

82

Commission

take

decision on the integrality, accuracy and veracity of the accounts

3

83

Portuguese

paying

agencies

1

84

additional checks

opekepe

Maltese paying agency 'MRAE', the Portuguese paying agencies 'IFADAP' and 'IFAP' and the Finnish paying agency 'MAVI

1

85

amounts

are

to be deducted from, or added to, the advances against expenditure from the second month following that in which the accounts clearance decision is taken

2

86

recovery of those irregularities

has not taken

place within 4 years of the primary administrative or judicial finding, or within 8 years

1

87

recovery

is taken

to the national courts

1

88

recovery procedures

undertaken

response to irregularities

1

89

Member States

submit

to the Commission, together with the annual accounts, a summary report on the recovery procedures

4

90

Detailed rules on the appli- cation of the Member States' reporting obligation of the amounts to be recovered

are laid down

in Regulation

3

91

Annex III to the said Regulation

provides

model tables 1 and 2 that have to be provided in 2008 by the Member States

4

92

tables

completed

by the Member States

2

93

Commission

should decide

on the financial consequences of non-recovery of irregularities older than 4 or 8 years respectively

1

94

This Decision

is

prejudice to future conformity decisions pursuant to Article 32 of Regu- lation

3

95

Member States

may decide

not to pursue recovery

2

96

recovery

proves

owing to the insolvency, recorded and recognised under national law, of the debtor or the persons legally responsible for the irregularity

1

97

recovery

proves

impossible

1

98

decision

be taken

costs already and likely to be incurred total more than the amount to be recovered

1

99

recovery

is taken

to the national courts

1

100

that decision

has been taken

within 4 years of the primary administrative or judicial finding or within 8 years

1

101

100 % of the financial consequences of the non-recovery

should be borne

by the Community budget

1

102

summary report

referred

to in Article 32 of Regulation

2

103

Member State

decided

not to pursue recovery and the grounds for the decision

3

104

amounts

be borne

by the Community budget

1

105

amounts

are not charged

to the Member States concerned

2

106

This Decision

is

without prejudice to future conformity decisions pursuant to Article 32 of the said Regu- lation

3

107

Member States

concerned

on the basis of Decisions 2008/396/EC and 2009/87/EC

3

108

amounts

withheld

from the Member States

2

109

Commission

must take

account of the amounts

2

110

decisions

taken

subsequently by the Commission excluding from Community financing expenditure not effected in accordance with Community rules, The accounts of the Greek paying agency

4

111

Portuguese

paying

agencies 'IFADAP' and 'IFAP

1

112

MAVI' concerning expenditure financed by the European Agricultural Guarantee Fund (EAGF), in respect of the 2007 financial year

financed

by the European Agricultural Guarantee Fund

2

113

this Decision

does not prejudice

OPEKEPE', the Maltese paying agency 'MRAE

2

114

Member State

concerned

pursuant to this Decision, including those

3

115

amounts

are

recoverable from, or payable to

1

116

amounts

are set out

in the Annex

1

117

This Decision

is addressed

to the Republic of Greece, the Republic of Malta, the Portuguese Republic and the Republic of Finland

1

118

amount

taken

into account

1

119

amount

is

total of the annual declaration for the expenditure cleared

1

120

Assigned revenue part

would be

in advantage of Member State

2

121

Assigned revenue part of the Sugar Fund

would be

in the advantage of the Member State

2

122

Functioning of the European Union, inafter the group

set up

by Commission Decision 2006/210/EC

4

123

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, inafter the group

is

consultative group of high-level national experts on better regulation

3

124

better regulation

will remain

high on the Commission's political agenda

2

125

promotion of cooperation with Member States on better regulation issues

has

important role to play in taking forward that agenda

3

126

other documents

held

by statutory auditors or audit firms to the competent authorities of a third country

5

127

competent authorities of third countries

are

adequate for the purpose of transfer of audit working papers or other documents

5

128

other documents

held

by statutory auditors or audit firms to the competent authorities of a third country

5

129

transfer of audit working papers or other documents

reflects

substantial public interest related to carrying out inde- pendent public oversight

4

130

any such transfer by the competent authorities of Member States

should be made

solely for the purpose of the exercise of the competences of public oversight, external quality assurance and investigations of auditors and audit firms by the competent authorities of the third country concerned

10

131

information

are

subject to obligations of professional secrecy

1

132

persons

employed

formerly employed by competent authorities of the third country that receive

2

133

personal data

carried out

pursuant to this Directive

2

134

Council of 24 October 1995 on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data

applies

to the processing of personal data

2

135

other documents

held

by statutory auditors or audit firms to the competent authorities of the third countries

5

136

transfer of audit working papers or other documents

involves

disclosure of personal data

4

137

it

be carried out

in accordance with the provisions of Directive 95/46/EC

1

138

personal data

comprised

in transferred audit working papers

3

139

other documents

held

by statutory auditors or audit firms without the prior agreement of the competent authorities of the Member States concerned

6

140

Member States

should ensure

through working arrangements in accordance with Chapter IV of Directive 95/46/EC between their competent authorities and the competent authorities of third countries that the latter would not further disclose

5

141

European Data Protection Supervisor

was consulted

in respect of the present Decision

4

142

adequacy of competent authorities of a third country

should be assessed

in the light of the cooperation requirements pursuant to Article 36 of Directive 2006/43/EC or essentially equivalent functional results

4

143

competences

exercised

by the competent authorities of the third country

2

144

professional secrecy and confidentiality rules

implemented

by them

1

145

adequacy

should be assessed

in the light of the competences exercised by the competent authorities of the third country concerned, the safeguards against breaching professional secrecy and confidentiality rules implemented by them and their ability under their laws and regulations to cooperate with the competent authorities of Member States

5

146

Directive 2006/43/EC

have been carried out

with respect to the competent authorities of Canada, Japan and Swit- zerland

3

147

Adequacy decisions

should be taken

on the basis of those assessments with respect to those authorities

3

148

It

implements

sanctioning disclosure by its current or former employees of confidential information to any third person or authority

2

149

transferred audit

working

papers

3

150

purposes

2

151

other documents

held

by statutory auditors or audit firms solely for purposes

3

152

It

would use

transferred audit

2

153

audit

working

papers

3

154

other documents

held

by Canadian auditors or audit firms to the competent authorities of any Member State

6

155

it

may transfer

audit

2

156

Canadian Public Accountability Board

should be declared

adequate for the purpose of Article 47 of Directive 2006/43/EC

3

157

Public Accountants and Auditing Oversight Board within the Financial Services Agency of Japan

have competence

in the public oversight, external quality assurance and investigations of auditors and audit firms

7

158

This Decision

cover

to investigate auditors and audit firms

4

159

This Decision

cover

competences of the Financial Services Agency

2

160

audit

working

papers

3

161

other documents

held

by Japanese auditors or audit firms to the competent authorities of any Member State

6

162

they

may transfer

audit

2

163

Financial Services Agency of Japan and the Certified Public Accountants and Auditing Oversight Board of Japan

should be declared

adequate for the purpose of Article 47 of Directive 2006/43/EC

4

164

It

implements

sanctioning disclosure by its current or former employees of confidential information to any third person or authority

2

165

transferred audit

working

papers

3

166

purposes

2

167

other documents

held

by statutory auditors or audit firms solely for purposes

3

168

It

would use

transferred audit

2

169

audit

working

papers

3

170

other documents

held

by Swiss auditors or audit firms to the competent authorities of any Member State

6

171

it

may transfer

audit

2

172

Federal Audit Oversight Authority of Switzerland

should be declared

adequate for the purpose of Article 47 of Directive 2006/43/EC

5

173

transmission to the authorities

declared

adequate under this Decision of audit working papers or other documents held by statutory auditors or audit firms, upon prior agreement of the competent authorities of Member States, and access to or transmission of such papers by the competent authorities of Member States to those authorities

10

174

audit

working

papers

3

175

ones

set out

in this Decision

1

176

statutory auditors and audit firms

should not be allowed

to grant access, nor to transmit audit working papers or other documents held by statutory auditors or audit firms to those authorities under other conditions than the ones set out in this Decision and in Article 47 of Directive 2006/43/EC, for example on the basis of consent of the statutory auditor, the audit firms or the client company

9

177

eration arrangements

referred

to in Article 25 of Directive 2004/109/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 December 2004 on the harmon- isation of transparency requirements in relation to information about issuers whose securities are admitted to trading on a regulated market and amending Directive 2001/34/EC

5

178

This Decision

should be

without prejudice to the coop

1

179

this Decision

is taken

in the context of the transi

1

180

tional period

granted

to certain third country auditors and audit firms by Commission Decision 2008/627/EC of 29 July 2008 concerning a transitional period for audit activities of certain third country auditors and audit entities

6

181

this Decision

should not preempt

any final equivalence decisions that the Commission may adopt pursuant to Article 46 of Directive 2006/43/EC

5

182

eration between the competent authorities of the Member States and those of Canada, Japan and Swit

allow

exercise of their functions of public oversight, external quality assurance and investi

6

183

cooperation

takes

place in accordance with Article 47 of the Directive 2006/43/EC

2

184

working arrangements

concluded

with those authorities to allow the Commission to assess

3

185

Member States

should communicate

to the Commission the working arrangements

3

186

transfers of audit working papers

would be

exceptional

3

187

Switzerland in audit oversight

is

to reach mutual reliance on each other's oversight systems

4

188

mutual reliance

would be based

on the equivalence of Community and those countries' auditor oversight systems

3

189

following competent authorities of third countries

shall be considered

adequate for the purpose of Article 47 of Directive 2006/43/EC

3

190

other documents

held

by statutory auditors or audit firms

3

191

it

shall be carried out

by the competent authority of the Member State concerned

3

192

Article 53 of Directive 2006/43/EC, as of 29 June 2008, any transfer of audit working papers or other documents

shall be

either subject to prior approval by the competent authority of the Member State concerned

8

193

held by statutory auditors or audit firms

shall not serve

any other purposes than the public oversight, external quality assurance or investigations of auditors and audit firms

7

194

Decision 2005/880/EC

allowing

Netherlands the application of 250 kg nitrogen per hectare per year from livestock manure in farms with at least 70 %

3

195

Dutch legislation

implementing

Directive 91/676/EEC

1

196

phosphate and application standards

1

197

Netherlands

addressed

issue of nutrient surplus from manure and mineral fertilisers through several policy instruments and in the period 1992 to 2002

1

198

Netherlands

decreased

cattle numbers by 17 %, pigs by 14 % and sheep and goats by 21 %

1

199

Dutch legislation

included

application standards both for nitrogen and phosphate and application standards

2

200

Nitrogen and phosphorus in manure

decreased

respectively by 29 and 34 % in the period 1985 to 2002

2

201

manure

requested

by the Netherlands

1

202

manure

would not prejudice

achievement of the objectives of Directive 91/676/EEC, subject to certain strict conditions being met

2

203

conditions

included

establishment of fertiliser plans on a farm by farm basis, the recording of fertiliser practices through fertiliser accounts, periodic soil analysis, green cover in winter after maize, specific provisions on grass ploughing, no manure application before grass ploughing and adjustment of fertilisation to take into account the contribution of leguminous crops

2

204

sation

based

on crop needs and reduction and prevention of nitrogen losses to water

2

205

provisions

were aimed

at ensuring fertili- sation

1

206

derogation

granted

by Decision 2005/880/EC

2

207

competent authorities

were compelled

to ensure that manure production both in terms of nitrogen

3

208

phosphorus

would not increase

beyond the level of the year 2002 in accordance with the Dutch third national action program

3

209

derogation

would lead

to intensification

1

210

reports

referred

to in Article 8 and Article 10 of Decision 2005/880/EC in time

2

211

request

referred

to a detailed justification and to the approval of fourth Nitrates Action Programme

1

212

request

referred

Dutch House of Representatives

1

213

considerable) progress

made

in line with the conditions of the 2006- 2009 derogation and the challenges ahead

1

214

stricter phosphorus application standards

based

on the soil phosphorus status

2

215

It

closed

periods for land application of fertilisers

1

216

It

builds

further on the third action program

2

217

legal measures

need be

by further reinforced action beyond the period 2010-2013

1

218

legal measures

aim

at a further reduction of nutrient surplus and further improvement of water quality

1

219

concentration (including phosphorus) in surface water with main effects of the third action

program

to be expected in the upcoming years

2

220

period 2006-2009 approximately 24 000 grassland farms corresponding to approximately 830 000 ha of cultivated land

were encompassed

by the derogation

1

221

derogation

leads

to intensification

1

222

competent authorities

should continue

to ensure that manure production both in terms of nitrogen

3

223

phosphorus

does not increase

level of the year 2002

1

224

Directive 91/676/EEC and executing the fourth action program

has been adopted

applies equally to the requested derogation

2

225

Commission

considers

that the amount of manure requested by the Netherlands for the period 2010-2013

2

226

strict conditions

established

by Decision 2005/880/EC

1

227

themselves

would not prejudice

achievement of the objectives of Directive 91/676/EEC

1

228

concerned

may continue

to benefit from a derogation

1

229

it

extend

validity of Decision 2005/880/EC to 31 December 2013 under the same conditions as those

2

230

Article 10 of Decision 2005/880/EC

be adapted

aligned with the deadline for reporting obligations under article 8 of Decision 2005/880/EC

3

231

report

shall be transmitted

to the Commission annually in the second quarter of the year following the year of activity

2

232

This Decision

shall apply

until 31 December 2013 in the context of the fourth Dutch Nitrates Action Programme

3

233

regard to Regulation (EC) No 999/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 May 2001

laying down

rules for the prevention, control and eradication of certain transmissible spongiform encephalopathies, and in particular the second subparagraph of Article 6

3

234

prevention, control and eradication of transmissible spongiform

encephalopathies

TSEs

1

235

Member State

carry out

annual moni- toring programme for TSEs, in accordance with Annex III to that Regulation

5

236

bovine animals

belonging

to specified age groups

1

237

programmes

are

to cover as a minimum certain subpopulations of bovine animals

1

238

improvement of the epidemiological situation of their country

may have

annual monitoring programmes

1

239

Member States

listed

to revise their annual monitoring programmes

2

240

Member States

listed

in the Annex to that Decision

4

241

all animals

belonging

to certain subpopulations of bovine animals above 48 months of age

1

242

programmes

are

to apply at least to all animals

1

243

Commission

revise

annual monitoring programme as regards BSE

3

244

I of Chapter A of Annex III to Regulation

laid down

in Cyprus from 29 June 2009 to 3 July 2009 in order to verify compliance with the epidemiological criteria

3

245

implementation in Cyprus of the rules on protective measures regarding bovine spongiform encephalopathies

laid down

in Regulation

2

246

implementation in Cyprus of the rules on protective measures regarding bovine spongiform encephalopathies

laid down

No 999/2001

1

247

all the requirements laid down in the third subparagraph of Article 6(1b) and all the epidemiological criteria

laid down

in the third subparagraph of Article 6

1

248

all the epidemiological criteria

set out

in point 7 of Part I of Chapter A of Annex III to that Regulation

2

249

all the requirements laid down in the third subparagraph of Article 6(1b) and all the epidemiological criteria

were checked

found to be met by Cyprus

1

250

submitted by Cyprus to revise its annual monitoring programme as regards BSE

has been

favourably evaluated

2

251

BSE

testing

in that Member State

2

252

48 months

is

new age limit for BSE

1

253

Cyprus

revise

annual monitoring program

1

254

Annex to Decision 2009/719/EC

is replaced

by the text in the Annex to this Decision

4

255

objective

is

to foster better exploitation of the industrial potential of policies of innovation, research and technological development in the field of Earth obser- vation and to provide information services

2

256

various partners

involved

in GMES

1

257

vation capacity

meeting

demands of users

1

258

it

is

necessary to coordinate the activities of the various partners involved in GMES and to develop, establish and operate a service and obser- vation capacity

1

259

Commission

may need

to call upon the expertise of specialists in an advisory body

1

260

we care for a safer planet', the Commission

announced

establishment of a Partners Board to assist the Commission in the overall coordination of GMES

3

261

It

is

therefore necessary to set up a group of experts in the field of GMES and Earth observation and to define its tasks and its structure

1

262

group

should help

to ensure the coordination of contributions to GMES by all partners, making best use of existing capacities and identifying gaps to be addressed at Union level

2

263

Commission in moni

toring

coherent implementation of the European Earth Observation Programme

4

264

It

should assist

Commission in moni

1

265

It

enable

exchange of good practices in GMES and Earth observation

1

266

It

should monitor

evolution of policy

1

267

Representatives

should be nominated

by their national authorities responsible for Earth observation in their Member State

4

268

security as

set out

in the Annex to Commission Decision 2001/844/EC, ECSC, Euratom

3

269

Board

should be provided

for, without prejudice to the Commission's rules on security as

2

270

organisations

involved

in Earth observation

1

271

Representatives of organisations

attend

meetings of the group as observers

1

272

Commission

consider

advisability of an extension

1

273

Commission

will

in due time

2

274

GMES Partners Board

referred

to as 'the Board

1

275

GMES Partners Board

is

hereby set up

1

276

questions

2

277

to establish cooperation between Member States bodies and the Commission on questions

gaps

to be addressed at European level

4

278

GMES activities

cost

assessment and preliminary budgetary strategy

1

279

it

consult

Board on a specific question

1

280

members

shall be nominated

by national authorities of the Member States

4

281

representative of Switzerland and a representative of Norway

shall be invited

as permanent observers

1

282

They

are replaced

term of office ends

1

283

They

shall remain

in office

1

284

Commission

shall be assisted

by the European Space Agency

3

285

matters

2

286

Commission

shall be assisted

by the European Environment Agency

3

287

procedures and schedule

established

by it

1

288

Board and its subgroups

meet

on Commission premises in accordance with the procedures and schedule

2

289

Commission

shall provide

secre- tarial services

2

290

Other Commission officials with an interest in the proceedings

may attend

meetings of the Board and its sub- groups

2

291

rules of procedure

adopted

by the Commission

2

292

annual budget

allocated

to the Board by the responsible Commission departments

2

293

This Decision

shall enter

into force on the third day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union

4

294

Subscriptions to the Official Journal of the European Union

is published

in the official languages of the European Union

4

295

Subscriptions to the Official Journal of the European Union

are

available for 22 language versions

3

296

Official Journal

comprises

two series, L

1

297

separate subscription

must be taken out

for each language version

1

298

accordance with Council Regulation

published

in Official Journal L 156 of 18 June 2005

3

299

institutions of the European Union

are

temporarily not bound by the obligation to draft all acts in Irish and publish them in that language

2

300

Irish editions of the Official Journal

are

therefore sold separately

1

301

Subscriptions to the Supplement to the Official Journal (S Series - tendering procedures for public contracts)

cover

all 23 official language versions on a single multilingual CD-ROM

2

302

subscribers to the Official Journal of the European Union

can receive

various Annexes to the Official Journal

3

303

notices

inserted

in the Official Journal of the European Union

2

304

Subscribers

are informed

of the publication of Annexes by notices

1

305

CD-Rom formats

will be replaced

by DVD formats during 2010

1

306

periodicals, such as the subscription to the Official Journal of the European Union

are

available from our commercial distributors

2

307

http://eur-lex.europa.eu

offers

direct access to European Union legislation free of charge

2

308

http://publications.europa.eu/others/agents/index_en.htm EUR-Lex

offers

direct access to European Union legislation free of charge

2

309

Official Journal of the European Union

can be consulted

on this website, as can the Treaties

2


Name:	LexUriServ.do.pdf source
Modified date:	2010-02-05 16:41
Language:	English
Words:	6789
Sentences:	213
Size:	27.16 standard page(s)*

Visibility:	Friends

Text Knode